<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Developers _Are_ Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.h2os.org/archives/bydate/2004/04/29/developers__are__users/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.h2os.org/archives/bydate/2004/04/29/developers__are__users</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 06:10:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: d.w.</title>
		<link>http://www.h2os.org/archives/bydate/2004/04/29/developers__are__users/comment-page-1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>d.w.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h2os.org/TEST/wordpress-1.5-beta1/archives/bydate/2004/04/29/developers-_are_-users#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Excellent post.

I can&#039;t understand the neverending FUDfest against Atom.  Is Mr. Winer so oblivious that he failed to notice that the genesis of Atom was a direct result of one of his own, earlier, FUD campaigns (the &quot;funky RSS&quot; debacle)?  It is possible to look back at the comments of this entry ( &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/1460.html&quot;&gt;http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/1460.html&lt;/a&gt; ) and see the exact point where the principal movers decided it was easier to start over with something else rather than continue to be subjected to vague threats and handwaving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t understand the neverending FUDfest against Atom.  Is Mr. Winer so oblivious that he failed to notice that the genesis of Atom was a direct result of one of his own, earlier, FUD campaigns (the &#8220;funky RSS&#8221; debacle)?  It is possible to look back at the comments of this entry ( <a href="http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/1460.html">http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/1460.html</a> ) and see the exact point where the principal movers decided it was easier to start over with something else rather than continue to be subjected to vague threats and handwaving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.h2os.org/archives/bydate/2004/04/29/developers__are__users/comment-page-1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h2os.org/TEST/wordpress-1.5-beta1/archives/bydate/2004/04/29/developers-_are_-users#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Oh, Dave&#039;s &quot;funkiness&quot; campaign is far from over.  In fact, he and Andrew have taken it to a whole new level.  More on this in a few days...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Dave&#8217;s &#8220;funkiness&#8221; campaign is far from over.  In fact, he and Andrew have taken it to a whole new level.  More on this in a few days&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.h2os.org/archives/bydate/2004/04/29/developers__are__users/comment-page-1#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h2os.org/TEST/wordpress-1.5-beta1/archives/bydate/2004/04/29/developers-_are_-users#comment-27</guid>
		<description>And yes, it&#039;s highly amusing to hear people bemoan the death of syndication if we don&#039;t all use RSS, as if &quot;RSS&quot; were just one thing.  Hell, &quot;RSS 2.0&quot; isn&#039;t even one thing -- it&#039;s at least 3 incompatible formats (Dave just kept revving the spec without updating the version number to maintain the thin appearance of &quot;stability&quot;).

Uncontested proof is here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/02/04/incompatible-rss&quot;&gt;http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/02/04/incompatible-rss&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes, it&#8217;s highly amusing to hear people bemoan the death of syndication if we don&#8217;t all use RSS, as if &#8220;RSS&#8221; were just one thing.  Hell, &#8220;RSS 2.0&#8243; isn&#8217;t even one thing &#8212; it&#8217;s at least 3 incompatible formats (Dave just kept revving the spec without updating the version number to maintain the thin appearance of &#8220;stability&#8221;).</p>
<p>Uncontested proof is here: <a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/02/04/incompatible-rss">http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/02/04/incompatible-rss</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

